«Оптика атмосферы и океана», 23, № 12 (2010)
ДИСТАНЦИОННОЕ ЗОНДИРОВАНИЕ АТМОСФЕРЫ, ГИДРОСФЕРЫ
И ПОДСТИЛАЮЩЕЙ ПОВЕРХНОСТИ
Consistency between backscatter lidar products
and visibility range
Valentin Mitev1, Renaud Matthey2*
1
CSEM, Rue de l'Observatoire 58, CH-2000 Neuchвtel, Switzerland
University of Neuchвtel, Dep. of Science, CH-2000 Neuchвtel, Switzerland
2
Поступила в редакцию 3.09.2010 г. <...> We present a consistency of the following values: the aerosol backscatter coefficient (ABC) and top of Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL), derived from backscatter lidar measurements from one side, and the visually
determined Visibility Range (VR) from the other. <...> The VR is determined towards long-range reference topographic targets in horizontal or slant path, while the lidar measurement is performed in vertical. <...> The mean extinction coefficient along line-of-sights to reference topographic objects is calculated from the lidar derived
backscatter coefficient with model aerosol extinction-to-backscatter ratio (EBR), when necessary, taking into
account the ABL top. <...> The mean extinction coefficient along the line-of-sight to the reference target is also
determined from the VR via Koschmieder equation. <...> The correlation coefficient between the two data sets is
R2 = 0.86 for all data points and R2 = 0.91 when selecting out the points with possible VR systematic error at
the farthest reference target. <...> Table 1
Specifications of the micro-pulse backscatter lidar
Laser/Wavelength
Average power
Polarization
Beam divergence
Pulse repetition rate
Telescope type/aperture
Field of view
Interference filter:
FWHM/Transmission
Range of full lidar overlap
Detection Type/Detectors
Range resolution and single
measurement duration
Micro-pulse/532 nm
1820 mW
Linear
0.25 mrad (full angle)
56 kHz
Kepler type/50 mm
0.5 mrad (full angle)
0.12 nm/38%
400 m
Photon counting/PMTs
30 m/6 s
The ABC is derived with the classical Fernald's
inversion procedure [8, 9]. <...> This gives the opportunity to estimate VR visually by distinguishing the
respective reference target (object) from its background [3, 11]. <...> The VR, RV, and the mean total extinction coefficient mean along the line-of-sight are linked via
Koschmieder equation [3, 11]. <...> RT
RT
(2 <...>
Оптика_атмосферы_и_океана_№12_2010.pdf
«Îïòèêà атмосферы и îêåàíà», 23, ¹ 12 (2010)
ДИСТАНЦИОННОЕ ЗОНДИРОВАНИЕ АТМОСФЕРЫ, ГИДРОСФЕРЫ
И ПОДСТИЛАЮЩЕЙ ПОВЕРХНОСТИ
Consistency between backscatter lidar products
and visibility range
Valentin Mitev1, Renaud Matthey2*
2University of Neuchâtel, Dep. of Science, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Поступила в редакцию 3.09.2010 ã.
1CSEM, Rue de l'Observatoire 58, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
We present a consistency of the following values: the aerosol backscatter coefficient (ABC) and top of Atmospheric
Boundary Layer (ABL), derived from backscatter lidar measurements from one side, and the visually
determined Visibility Range (VR) from the other. The VR is determined towards long-range reference topographic
targets in horizontal or slant path, while the lidar measurement is performed in vertical. The mean extinction
coefficient along line-of-sights to reference topographic objects is calculated from the lidar derived
backscatter coefficient with model aerosol extinction-to-backscatter ratio (EBR), when necessary, taking into
account the ABL top. The mean extinction coefficient along the line-of-sight to the reference target is also
determined from the VR via Koschmieder equation. The correlation coefficient between the two data sets is
R2
= 0.86 for all data points and R2
equation.
Motivation and Objectives
A motivation for this study is the quality control
of ABC derived with elastic backscatter lidars. In the
lidar networks such control is carried by numerical
exercises and lidar inter-comparisons campaigns [1, 2].
Although well established, such procedures suffer
from limitations. The numerical tests address only the
processing algorithm. The intercomparison campaigns
are expensive since they require to move the tested
lidars to a common site. I.e. there is no selfconsistent
method for ABC quality control during the
backscatter lidar operation at the home site.
Another motivation is the importance of VR for
air traffic at airports [3]. Although this problem is
addressed by backscatter lidars since a long time [3],
there are still open questions. As the measurements
shall be at slant-path, eye-safety regulations apply.
Eye-safe wavelength probing means that the VR
value shall be re-evaluated for the visible wavelength
range. One solution may be lidar measurements in
direction in which the eye-safety requirements may
be relaxed (e.g., vertical) or at some distance from
the airports. In such case, it is necessary to demonstrate
the consistency between the extinction in vertical
direction and slant-path VR.
The above motivations determine the objective
in this study: to demonstrate the consistency between
the backscatter lidar determined extinction coefficients
______________
* Valentin Mitev (valentin.mitev@csem.ch); Renaud
Matthey (renaud.matthey-de-lendroit@unine.ch).
and ABL top altitude, with the VR to reference targets
(objects) at horizontal and slant path direction.
Lidar and Site
The lidar measurements are performed in Neuchâtel,
Switzerland, 47.002°N, 6.955°E, 487 m above sea
level (asl). The backscatter lidar used in this study is
based on an instrument, initially developed for airborne
operation [4, 5]. Its adaptation for ground-based
operation and respective results were already reported
elsewhere [2, 6, 7]. The performances of the main lidar
subsystems are summarized in Table 1.
Tab le 1
Specifications of the micro-pulse backscatter lidar
Laser/Wavelength
Average power
Pulse repetition rate
Interference filter:
FWHM/Transmission
Range of full lidar overlap
Range resolution and single
measurement duration
Micro-pulse/532 nm
18–20 mW
Polarization Linear
Beam divergence
0.25 mrad (full angle)
5–6 kHz
Telescope type/aperture Kepler type/50 mm
Field of view
0.12 nm/38%
400 m
Detection Type/Detectors Photon counting/PMTs
30 m/6 s
The ABC is derived with the classical Fernald's
inversion procedure [8, 9]. The values for the molecular
Consistency between backscatter lidar products and visibility range
1051
0.5 mrad (full angle)
= 0.91 when selecting out the points with possible VR systematic error at
the farthest reference target.
Keywords: backscatter lidar, aerosol backscatter, extinction coefficient, visibility range, Koschmieder
Стр.1