Humanities & Social Sciences 10 (2016 9) 2365-2373 ~ ~ ~ УДК 81+811.111 The Foundations of 3D Analysis: 3D Model of the Avada Kedavra Curse in Potteriana Arsentiy I. Bochkarev* Novosibirsk State Technical University 20 K. Marx Str., Novosibirsk, 630073, Russia Received 05.06.2016, received in revised form 29.08.2016, accepted 09.09.2016 This article develops 3D analyss on the example of the Avada Kedavra curse which is a central linguistic means of the violent death leitmotif in Potteriana. <...> The author considers three dimensions of the analyzed object: semantics, syntactics and pragmatics. <...> The 3D model of the curse is based upon text analysis. <...> Moreover, the author introduced the cognitive structure of the violent death leitmotif being a form and a shape for the curse realization. <...> Semantics takes into account the relation between a sign and a denoting object; syntactics deals with the relation between signs; pragmatics is connected with the relation between a sign and a sign user. <...> The pragmatic influence on the semantic dimension of a word can be represented in the following way. <...> What I mean is that any identifying act exploits connections linking the language user to an object. <...> Even when the same user identifies a single object on different occasions, the connections he/ Arsentiy I. Bochkarev. <...> The Foundations of 3D Analysis: 3D Model of the Avada Kedavra Curse in Potteriana she exploits may be different. <...> As for the syntactic influence on the semantic dimension of a word it is also quite obvious. <...> There are a lot of words that refer to the same object. <...> Now, let us consider the semantic influence on the pragmatic dimension of a word. <...> It was already mentioned that synonyms refer to the same object. <...> But strictly speaking it is not really the same object. <...> The syntactic influence on the pragmatic dimension of a word is connected with the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. <...> Now, let us examine the pragmatic influence on the syntactic dimension of a word. <...> If language users of one social group use the word extensively but representatives of other groups do not, this word can become a marker of this group (a professionalism, a jargon word, a slang word, etc). <...> The semantic influence on the syntactic dimension of a word is enormous. <...> The full analysis of relations will <...>