Humanities & Social Sciences 5 (2015 8) 852-863 ~ ~ ~ УДК 165.324 “Plane of Immanence” and Apology of Transcendence Vitalii N. Drobyshev* Russian Christian Academy of the Humanities 15 naberezhnaia reki Fontanki, Saint-Petersburg, 190000, Russia Received 14.11.2014, received in revised form 19.12.2014, accepted 17.01.2015 The motive of immanence and its excogitation in philosophy of Gilles Deleuze is investigated in the article. <...> Author shows the impossibility of equation of the existential absurdity and philosophical inconceivability, and, basing on this affi rmation, excludes the possibility of theological perspective of the “Plane of immanence”, in spite of the fact that the renewed concept of transcendental lies outside the realm of idem perspective. <...> The overcoming of faith in Deleuze’s philosophy strings along with circumstantiation of the terms of real experience, opposable to terms of its possibility as such. <...> However, the analysis of this philosophy in its apophatic perspective shows the impossibility of replacing hypothetical character with the reality of experience. <...> Christian theology, focused on a real immanent God over life of man and speaking about the immanence of God, is not surprising us today. <...> In this behalf the advantages of the transcendent appear to be tempting, since they open a ways for topical sermon, which advocates for improvement of the world in alignment with its inner divine deepness. <...> There are no diffi culties to see that this theology feeds up not only by the common transformation of evidence of religiosity, fatigue of transcendent in which all the can be simply discovered, but also by the thought which propels pan(en)teism to the new level of conceptualization. <...> Among the modern concepts that feed up immanent theology, the major ones seems to be the “faith without faith” that inherits © Siberian Federal University. <...> In this article we will turn to the philosophy of G. Deleuze with intent to, by the example of this philosophy, trace the disruption of transcendent and resolve the issue of the possibility of immanence to become a theological condition. 1. <...> The motif substantiation of Agreeing with this motif, “Plane of immanence” appears as a explicate the motif of live immanence. can be only justifi ed by the multiplicity, whereas endurance that underlines it can not be enchained by discrete cohesions of totalizations and subjectifi cations. <...> Founding of authorities, which unify life and keep under the multiplication of differences, as it peculiar, according to Deleuze, to the Plato’s <...>