Журнал Сибирского федерального университета. Гуманитарные науки. Journal of Siberian Federal University, Humanities& Social Sciences №9 2012

Стр.1

Стр.2

Стр.3

Журнал Сибирского федерального университета Journal of Siberian Federal University Гуманитарные науки Humanities & Social Sciences Редакционный совет академик РАН Е.А.Ваганов академик РАН И.И.Гительзон академик РАН А.Г.Дегерменджи академик РАН В.Ф.Шабанов чл.-к. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук В.Л.Миронов чл.-к. РАН, д-р техн. наук Г.Л.Пашков чл.-к. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук В.В.Шайдуров член-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук В.В. Зуев Editorial Advisory Board Chairman: Eugene A. Vaganov Members: Josef J. Gitelzon Vasily F. Shabanov Andrey G. Degermendzhy Valery L. Mironov Gennady L. Pashkov Vladimir V. Shaidurov Vladimir V. Zuev Editorial Board: Editor-in-Chief: Mikhail I. Gladyshev Founding Editor: Vladimir I. Kolmakov Managing Editor: Olga F. Alexandrova Executive Editor for Humanities & Social Sciences: Natalia P. Koptseva Vladimir L. Gavrikov Rem G. Khlebopros and Angela V. Salagaeva Measuring the Information Flow Received by High School Students to Solve a Simple Research Problem – 1252 – Naum P. Abovskiy The Principles That Generate Innovative Construction Solutions – 1262 – Компьютерная верстка Е.В. Гревцовой Подписано в печать 25.09.2012 г. Формат 84x108/16. Усл. печ. л. 12,6. Уч.-изд. л. 12,1. Бумага тип. Печать офсетная. Тираж 1000 экз. Заказ 8774. Отпечатано в ПЦ БИК. 660041 Красноярск, пр. Свободный, 82а. CONTENTS / СОДЕРЖАНИЕ Nikolay T. Ryabtsev Modern Research Methodology in the Field of Innovative Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) – 1221 – Dmitry Bogdanov Crisis of Professional Russian Education and Ways of Its Overcoming – 1228 – Elena A. Shmeleva Innovation Potential of Acmeological Approach to Teaching Staff Training – 1235 – Vladimir I. Kirko, Anna V. Keush and Nikolay G. Shyshatskiy Problems of Modernization of the Economy of the Northern Territories – 1246 – 2012 5 (9)

Стр.1

Consulting Editors for Humanities & Social Sciences: Gershon M. Breslavs Sergey V. Deviatkin Sergey A. Drobyshevsky Sergey M. Geraschenko Oleg M. Gotlib Boris I. Khasan Igor E. Kim Natalia V. Kovtun Aleksandr A. Kronik Pavel V. Mandryka Boris V. Markov Valentin G. Nemirovsky Daniel V. Pivovarov Andrey V. Smirnov Viktor I. Suslov Evgeniya V. Zander Igor S. Pyzhev Vladimir I. Suprun Liudmila V. Kulikova Olga G. Smolyaninova Nicolai N. Petro Dr. Suneel Kumar Vladimir I. Kirko, Lyudmila. M. Fatkulina-Yaskova, Vasily V. Zaharuta The Estimation of the State of Objects in the Settlements of Evenki and Taimyr Autonomous Districts – 1278 – Julia G. Matushanskaya The Historical Concept of Josephus Flavius as the Sample for Christian Historiography – 1291 – Alexei V. Nesteruk osmology and Teleology: Purposiveness in the Study of the Universe Through the Reading of Kant’s Third Critique – 1304 – Tatiana V. Tverdokhlebova, Lada V. Danilova and Maxim S. Kuzmin Innovative Approaches in the Labor Organization of the Auxiliary Production at Mining and Smelting Enterprises – 1336 – Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ ПИ № ФС77-28-723 от 29.06.2007 г. Серия включена в «Перечень ведущих рецензируемых научных журналов и изданий, в которых должны быть опубликованы основные научные результаты диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора и кандидата наук» (редакция 2010 г.) Natalia V. Kovtun Gnostic Code in the Novel by L. Ulitskaya &Medea and Her Children – 1343 – Irina I. Plekhanova and Sergey R. Smirnov Organic Avant-Gardism of Gennady Aygi – 1357 – Alexander P. Svitin, Valery S. Efimov, Alla V. Lapteva and Maxim V. Rumyantsev New Approaches to the Problem of Actualization of the Historical and Cultural Heritage – 1368 –

Стр.2

Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 9 (2012 5) 1221-1227 ~ ~ ~ УДК 330.101 Modern Research Methodology in the Field of Innovative Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Nikolay T. Ryabtsev* National Research University – Higher School of Economics, HSE 20 Myasnitskaya St., Moscow, 101000 Russia 1 Received 18.08.2011, received in revised form 19.12.2011, accepted 12.01.2012 Author proposes the analysis of modern methodology in investigation of small innovative companies. Investigation based on 7 world journals for the 2006-2010 years. Efforts were placed to identify main research tendencies in the fi eld of small innovative companies. It allows improving our understanding about the dynamics of knowledge extension during the last years. Also it contributes to our understanding of business activity among innovative SMEs in Russia. The results could be useful for academics who are focused on innovative SMEs and for public governors who are responsible for the development of public policy to decrease institutional restrictions and to propound competitive ways to stimulate innovative SMEs’ activity. Keywords: innovative SMEs, small enterprises, methodology, modern tendencies. Introduction Our knowledge about small innovative companies signifi cantly increased from the end of 20th century. We have declared small innovative companies as a way to commercialize new ideas or engineering. Small innovative companies have much more potential for growth than traditional enterprises due to the ability to transform markets, develop new niches. As a result small innovative companies are very attractive for investments. But from other side a high level of risk, which is linked with innovative SMEs, is applicable mostly for venture investors. For the owners innovative company is not only an opportunity to create initial capital during the risky and manageable © Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved activity, but also a way for self-realization. For global economy an innovative company is a source of new economy drivers. Innovative SMEs introduce new technologies, create additional jobs, and provide countries’ competitiveness. Development of the knowledge about small innovative companies faces the same restrictions as the fi eld of entrepreneurship at whole. The researches become more narrow and mostly concentrate on the predictors of success; strategies, which provides the fi rm’s growth [15, 233]. The dominance of quantitative methods could become a challenge in the development of the theoretical base [18, 4]. Also the theory of entrepreneurship is a very dynamic fi eld. Sometimes there is no * Corresponding author E-mail address: nikolay.ryabtsev@gmail.com 1 # 1221 #

Стр.3