Журнал Сибирского федерального университета
Journal of Siberian Federal University
Гуманитарные науки
Humanities & Social Sciences
Редакционный совет
академик РАН Е.А.Ваганов
академик РАН И.И.Гительзон
академик РАН А.Г.Дегерменджи
академик РАН В.Ф.Шабанов
чл.-к. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук
В.Л.Миронов
чл.-к. РАН, д-р техн. наук
Г.Л.Пашков
чл.-к. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук
В.В.Шайдуров
член-корр. РАН, д-р физ.-мат. наук
В.В. Зуев
Editorial Advisory Board
Chairman:
Eugene A. Vaganov
Members:
Josef J. Gitelzon
Vasily F. Shabanov
Andrey G. Degermendzhy
Valery L. Mironov
Gennady L. Pashkov
Vladimir V. Shaidurov
Vladimir V. Zuev
Editorial Board:
Editor-in-Chief:
Mikhail I. Gladyshev
Founding Editor:
Vladimir I. Kolmakov
Managing Editor:
Olga F. Alexandrova
Executive Editor
for Humanities & Social Sciences:
Natalia P. Koptseva
CONTENTS / СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
Boris D. Elkonin
Source and Driving Forces for Development
– 1525 –
Isak D. Froumin
Socio-Economic Development and the Next Generation: Five
Transitions
– 1534 –
Vasily V. Davydov
Development Pedagogy and the Theory of Recapitulation
– 1542 –
Anatoly G. Kasprzhak
Pedagogy of Development: a View from 2012 to 2001
– 1549 –
Katerina N. Polivanova
Problems of Learning Motivation. The age Aspect
– 1560 –
Boris I. Khasan
Conflicts and Negotiations $ Educational Content and Conditions
for the Development
– 1570 –
Viktor A. Bolotov
Development Pedagogy $ the Crisis of the Genre?
– 1583 –
Tatiana I. Ustus
The Ability to Study and Conflict Competence
– 1593 –
Компьютерная верстка Е.В. Гревцовой
Подписано в печать 23.11.2012 г. Формат 84x108/16. Усл. печ. л. 15,5.
Уч.-изд. л. 15,0. Бумага тип. Печать офсетная. Тираж 1000 экз. Заказ 10632.
Отпечатано в ПЦ БИК. 660041 Красноярск, пр. Свободный, 82а.
2012 5 (11)
Стр.1
Consulting Editors
for Humanities & Social Sciences:
Gershon M. Breslavs
Sergey V. Deviatkin
Sergey A. Drobyshevsky
Sergey M. Geraschenko
Oleg M. Gotlib
Boris I. Khasan
Igor E. Kim
Natalia V. Kovtun
Aleksandr A. Kronik
Pavel V. Mandryka
Boris V. Markov
Valentin G. Nemirovsky
Daniel V. Pivovarov
Andrey V. Smirnov
Viktor I. Suslov
Evgeniya V. Zander
Igor S. Pyzhev
Vladimir I. Suprun
Liudmila V. Kulikova
Olga G. Smolyaninova
Nicolai N. Petro
Dr. Suneel Kumar
Vladimir S. Sobkin and Kseniya N. Skobeltsina
Play Activity of Preschool Children: Joint Play with Parents,
Game Preferences and Favorite Toys
– 1602 –
Elena Î. Smirnova
Methods of Moral Education in Various Pre-School Educational
Programmes
– 1617 –
Oksana S. Ostroverkh
Pedagogical Action in Educational Space of the Younger Pupils
Schooling Activities
– 1628 –
Larisa A. Novopashina
The Essence of Adolescence and its Designing in Educational
Environment
– 1639 –
Pavel A. Sergomanov and Natalia P. Vasilyeva
Institutional Mechanisms and Conditions for the Transition to
Independence and Responsibility. Adolescence as a Transition
– 1660 –
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ
ПИ № ФС77-28-723 от 29.06.2007 г.
Серия включена в «Перечень ведущих
рецензируемых научных журналов
и изданий, в которых должны
быть опубликованы основные научные
результаты диссертации на
соискание ученой степени доктора и
кандидата наук» (редакция 2010 г.)
Kirill G. Mitrofanov,
Natalia P. Vasilyeva and Elena Yu. Kozyreva
Processes of Professionalization of Teachers as the Technology
of Education Quality Management
– 1671 –
Elena Y. Fedorenkon
Structure and Dynamics of Mental Health as a Developable
Resource
– 1685 –
Victor E. Pakhal’yan
Practical Psychologists’ Training: Difficulties and Prospects
– 1694 –
Olga G. Smolyaninova,
Olga A. Imanova and Olga Y. Bugakova
Using E-Portfolio in Vocational Education and Training
– 1707 –
Стр.2
Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 11 (2012 5) 1525-1533
~ ~ ~
УДК 159.922.7
Source and Driving Forces
for Development
Boris D. Elkonin*
Institute of the Russian Academy of Education
the Laboratory of the Junior School Phycology оf Psychological
4 build., 9 Mohovaya st., Moscow, 125009 Russia 1
Received 04.11.2011, received in revised form 11.11.2011, accepted 23.11.2012
Based on the classic for the Russian children’s psychology attitudes about the contradiction of the ideal
form and the level of somatic organization of a child, the idea about the causes of the development,
as the question why when you reach certain key points of development, the process does not stop and
does not turn into the functioning according to the already known schemes, but develops further,
is researched and developed. It is alleged that the development of an action as the development
of the world has two focusing and two completions. Firstly, the completion of the development in
the construction of an individual action and, secondly, its completion in the construction of the
combined, mutual action. The importance of realizing that mediacy – transferring samples – is not
completed by the formation of the separate cultural skills, but fi nds its fullness by being included into
the management of the nature of movement, fi nding its rhythm and measure – the step of development,
is emphasized.
Keywords: activity, the source of activity, action, subjectivity, the model, the driving forces of
development.
The original question
The subject of
the driving forces is the
key subject for all the classical theories and
all the periodizations of ontogeny. In Soviet
psychology the key thesis about driving force,
the source and the conditions of development
are presented in the book by D.B. Elkonin
“Child Psychology”, published in 1960. These
thesis concerns leading activity as the driving
force of child’s development, the environment –
the medium of ideal forms (cultural norms) –
as the source of development and the level of
somatic organization of a child as a condition of
development (Elkonin, 1960: p. 16 – 19).
* Corresponding author E-mail address: belconin@bk.ru
1
© Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved
# 1525 #
Later,
having developed a well-known
periodization of ontogeny, D.B. Elkonin added
his own ideas about the driving forces of
development. He stated that the driving force of
the deployment of activities, and, consequently,
the driving force of development is the difference
(inconsistency, contradiction) of motivationalsemantic
and
operational-technical aspects
of activity, in other words mismatch and the
problematic relationship between the meaning
and the mode of action (Elkonin, 1989: p. 490).
The thesis about the essential contradictions
of the meaning and the mode of action requires
clarifi cation of
the question about the driving
Стр.3